Under INTERNATIONAL ORDERS: ALL LAWYERS, whether they left law school yesterday or 50 years ago, are EXACTLY THE SAME. All lawyers have to file the same motions and follow the same procedures in using the same unconstitutional “lawyer system”.
Case law for those fighting a foreclosure Pro-Se:
* Picking v. Pennsylvania R. Co. 151 Fed. 2nd 240; Pucket v. Cox 456 2nd 233. Pro se pleadings are to be considered without regard to a technicality; pro se litigants pleadings are not to be held to the same high standards of perfection as lawyers.
1. Platsky v. C.I.A. 953 F.2d. 25. Additionally, pro se litigants are to be given reasonable opportunity to remedy the defects in their pleadings. Reynoldson v. Shillinger 907F .2d 124, 126 (10th Cir. 1990); See also Jaxon v. Circle K. Corp. 773 F.2d 1138, 1140 (10th Cir. 1985) (1)
2. Haines v. Kerner (92 S.Ct. 594). The respondent in this action is a nonlawyer and is moving forward in Propria persona.
Subscribe to my Youtube Channel we need 1000 subscriptions to be able to host ads on our channel. The income generated from the ads will allow us to become not – for profit, and we will be able to help more families struggling in foreclosure with no finances.