Traffic Ticket Tips 2- 42 USC 1983 Civil Right Lawsuit Package

November 3, 2021
A person handing paper to another person in the back of a car.

Traffic Ticket Tips- The new 42 U.S.C. 1983 civil rights traffic ticket lawsuit package is looking pretty Hot!

The package will be done tomorrow however the instructional video and the offer page are not complete. If you are a paralegal or experienced and do not need to wait for the instructional video please email me at winincourts1@gmail.com and type “Traffic Bomb” in the subject line and I will email you my payment link, and the package after confirmation. This new package will be on sale for half price at 399.00 to the first 10- people and then it will go up to the regular price. Don’t miss out!

This is what the short and plain statement of the traffic ticket lawsuit looks like.

Short And Plain Statement of The Claim:

The defendant’s, acted with deliberate indifference to the Constitution and federal laws when performing an illegal traffic stop without an injured party. During that stop police officer, Sam Smith issues the plaintiff a traffic ticket.

The Separation Clause:

The police officer signed the summons as an officer of the court in violation of the “separation of the power clause in the constitution. The defendant’s conspired to violate the plaintiff’s right UNDER 42 U.S. CODE SEC. 1983, the plaintiff’s right to due process.

The Administrative Procedures Act of 1946:

The defendants violated the administrative procedures act of 1946, which in short mandates that corporations and policies must be in harmony with the constitution, and federal laws. The structure of the traffic ticket R.I.C.O. scheme shows it is unconstitutional starting at the gate when the police officer illegally signs in the place of a judicial officer of the court.

The Officers Training:

The officer is trained to proceed illegally and granted incentives when the officer issues a high number of illegal traffic tickets. The plaintiff has been violated by the employee enforcing the city rules, policies. Also, the plaintiff’s right to due process is violated by the court’s procedures and local rules. The parties in this traffic ticket scheme court have a conflict of interest because they all are being paid by the same state corporation. Municipal court has no legal judicial authority to make a legal determination in an administrative court process.

Demand For Judgement:

The plaintiff demands the court to grant judgment for 20- Million Dollars, in compensatory, punitive, and future damages, revoke the judge/prosecutor’s bond and license to practice law.

#traffic #trafficticket #trafficcitation

Coach Neighbors

Coach Guy Neighbors Coach Guy Neighbors is the founder of Pro Se Legal School, a higher education platform built to help self-represented individuals better understand the current administrative court process and shift them from their current position to one of authority. Pro Se Legal School's higher education program will help you jump-start your critical thinking process. You will learn how to structure your unconventional game plan when facing serious legal challenges. For many years, Coach Neighbors has coached and studied the experiences of self-represented litigants dealing with foreclosure, eviction, debt collection, property disputes, civil lawsuits, and other court proceedings across the country. He developed his strategies and continually refined them through real-time feedback from people using these approaches and reporting what happened in their cases. His work grew from recognizing a recurring problem: everyday people often enter court focused entirely on proving they are right while the process continues moving against them. They may not know how to question jurisdiction, standing, judicial authority, due process, notice, procedural violations, or whether important objections have been addressed. That observation became the foundation of Coach Neighbors' unconventional approach to court education. Instead of teaching people to simply react to whatever is filed against them, he teaches self-represented individuals how to use the counterclaim process to add the state, the judge, and the prosecutor to their administrative action as litigants, examine the process itself, identify potential problems, preserve objections, create a record, develop their own claims and challenges, and determine what needs to happen next to protect their due process. A central principle of his approach is that you do not always have to win the entire case today. The immediate objective is to stop the next step, force an unanswered issue onto the record, protect your position, and prevent important constitutional and procedural questions from simply being ignored. As a coach, Coach Neighbors works directly with self-represented individuals to help them understand what is happening in their cases and develop a game plan to protect their due process. His work is especially focused on people facing situations where their homes, property, money, credit, family security, or ability to be heard may be at stake. Through Pro Se Legal School, Coach Neighbors has developed higher educational programs, courses, document examples, workshops, live training, coaching programs, and document systems designed around the problems self-represented people encounter. His work also extends into ongoing public education through live streams and workshops where he breaks down court procedures, documents, strategies, due process issues, and real-world problems in language ordinary people can understand. After approximately 17 years, the mission remains simple: give self-represented people information, structure, higher education, and a different way of looking at the court process so they are better prepared to stop the next step, instead of simply watching the process happen to them. Coach Guy Neighbors Founder, Pro Se Legal School winincourtnow.com