Traffic Ticket Tips 2- 42 USC 1983 Civil Right Lawsuit Package
Traffic Ticket Tips- The new 42 U.S.C. 1983 civil rights traffic ticket lawsuit package is looking pretty Hot!
The package will be done tomorrow however the instructional video and the offer page are not complete. If you are a paralegal or experienced and do not need to wait for the instructional video please email me at firstname.lastname@example.org and type “Traffic Bomb” in the subject line and I will email you my payment link, and the package after confirmation. This new package will be on sale for half price at 399.00 to the first 10- people and then it will go up to the regular price. Don’t miss out!
This is what the short and plain statement of the traffic ticket lawsuit looks like.
Short And Plain Statement of The Claim:
The defendantâ€™s, acted with deliberate indifference to the Constitution and federal laws when performing an illegal traffic stop without an injured party. During that stop police officer, Sam Smith issues the plaintiff a traffic ticket.
The Separation Clause:
The police officer signed the summons as an officer of the court in violation of the â€œseparation of the power clause in the constitution. The defendantâ€™s conspired to violate the plaintiffâ€™s right UNDER 42 U.S. CODE SEC. 1983, the plaintiffâ€™s right to due process.
The Administrative Procedures Act of 1946:
The defendants violated the administrative procedures act of 1946, which in short mandates that corporations and policies must be in harmony with the constitution, and federal laws. The structure of the traffic ticket R.I.C.O. scheme shows it is unconstitutional starting at the gate when the police officer illegally signs in the place of a judicial officer of the court.
The Officers Training:
The officer is trained to proceed illegally and granted incentives when the officer issues a high number of illegal traffic tickets. The plaintiff has been violated by the employee enforcing the city rules, policies. Also, the plaintiffâ€™s right to due process is violated by the courtâ€™s procedures and local rules. The parties in this traffic ticket scheme court have a conflict of interest because they all are being paid by the same state corporation. Municipal court has no legal judicial authority to make a legal determination in an administrative court process.
Demand For Judgement:
The plaintiff demands the court to grant judgment for 20- Million Dollars, in compensatory, punitive, and future damages, revoke the judge/prosecutorâ€™s bond and license to practice law.
#traffic #trafficticket #trafficcitation