utm_source=taboola&utm_medium=referral utm_source=taboola&utm_medium=referral

Traffic Ticket Tips 2- 42 USC 1983 Civil Right Lawsuit Package

November 3, 2021
A person handing paper to another person in the back of a car.

Traffic Ticket Tips- The new 42 U.S.C. 1983 civil rights traffic ticket lawsuit package is looking pretty Hot!

The package will be done tomorrow however the instructional video and the offer page are not complete. If you are a paralegal or experienced and do not need to wait for the instructional video please email me at winincourts1@gmail.com and type “Traffic Bomb” in the subject line and I will email you my payment link, and the package after confirmation. This new package will be on sale for half price at 399.00 to the first 10- people and then it will go up to the regular price. Don’t miss out!

This is what the short and plain statement of the traffic ticket lawsuit looks like.

Short And Plain Statement of The Claim:

The defendant’s, acted with deliberate indifference to the Constitution and federal laws when performing an illegal traffic stop without an injured party. During that stop police officer, Sam Smith issues the plaintiff a traffic ticket.

The Separation Clause:

The police officer signed the summons as an officer of the court in violation of the “separation of the power clause in the constitution. The defendant’s conspired to violate the plaintiff’s right UNDER 42 U.S. CODE SEC. 1983, the plaintiff’s right to due process.

The Administrative Procedures Act of 1946:

The defendants violated the administrative procedures act of 1946, which in short mandates that corporations and policies must be in harmony with the constitution, and federal laws. The structure of the traffic ticket R.I.C.O. scheme shows it is unconstitutional starting at the gate when the police officer illegally signs in the place of a judicial officer of the court.

The Officers Training:

The officer is trained to proceed illegally and granted incentives when the officer issues a high number of illegal traffic tickets. The plaintiff has been violated by the employee enforcing the city rules, policies. Also, the plaintiff’s right to due process is violated by the court’s procedures and local rules. The parties in this traffic ticket scheme court have a conflict of interest because they all are being paid by the same state corporation. Municipal court has no legal judicial authority to make a legal determination in an administrative court process.

Demand For Judgement:

The plaintiff demands the court to grant judgment for 20- Million Dollars, in compensatory, punitive, and future damages, revoke the judge/prosecutor’s bond and license to practice law.

#traffic #trafficticket #trafficcitation

Coach Neighbors

I am the creator of advocates for Justice Paralegal Service to offer an affordable legal option to folks who do not trust attorneys. I provide the tools and group coaching you need to get control of your legal situation without an attorney in your face. I have been through what you are facing, and that experience drove me to learn the loopholes (defects) in the attorney’s processes and procedures that rob the court of jurisdiction. I learned how to structure legal documents that will address the defects in the legal process. I have a private Facebook group where I communicate with group members who are using my documents and strategies. The real-time feedback on how attorneys are trying to avoid liability allows me to adjustments the lawsuit packages to close those doors the attorneys try and use. If you are ready to try a non-conventional strategy to get control of your legal situation, I have what you need.